On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:48 -0500, gene heskett wrote: > On Wednesday, December 15, 2010 05:44:12 pm Dan Kegel did opine: > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Harry Van Haaren > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Anybody know of a public email provider that is better? Or more so: > > >> that can prove they are better? > > > > > > I'm afraid every webmail provider in the world is > > > going to have the same basic problem: you shouldn't > > > be trusting other people with your data. > > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/breaking-news-eff-victory-appeals- > > court-holds is a ray of hope, though... > > Yes it is. Now, if we can just get a law that when I have pulled the msg > to my machine, and issued the delete to the server, it truly was deleted, > then they would need a search warrant to my machine in order to see > yesterdays emails already pulled. The move has been to make the ISP's hold > those supposedly deleted messages till the statutes run out, and TBT, there > probably isn't an ISP on the planet with THAT much storage, not without > treating it like an unfunded mandate. Which it sure is.
Good thought, 'rm' vs 'shred' ;), see 'man shred', but I'm sure they do run 'rm' or any Windows equivalent. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
