Hi Sascha, I found the AlsaModularSynth to be a great sounding "analog-ish" modular synthesizer with a very direct and very usable interface.
I don't quite understand your vision just yet. Is the idea basically to write an attractive and usable GUI for an existing synth (engine)? On 2 January 2011 21:47, Julien Claassen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Sascha! > I'm not good at coding at all, but I think a more useable framework for a > softsynth, if you like to build it with an existing one, might be bristol. > Bristol is a synth emulator. It has a couple of synths already. But it might > not suffer, having a new filter or different oscillator in it, if Nick is OK > with that. The synths it emulates, are basically built from the components > (filters, oscs, etc.), that are in the engine. Then they are connected in a > particular way and get a GUI/CLI put on top of them. Bristol has, what I > would call MIDI learning. You can easily assing MIDI controls to controls of > the currently loaded synth and I think you can save them as well. Have a > look at his site: > http://bristol.sf.net > The sweet thing about using this would be, that you have to implement the > new components and then there is an API - so I believe - for relatively > easily constructing the connections and the <UIs. I know only of the textUI, > which is very clever and helpful! > Kindly yours > julien > > -------- > Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles) > > ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ======== > http://ltsb.sourceforge.net > the Linux TextBased Studio guide > ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: ======= > http://www.juliencoder.de > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
