On 02/23/2011 07:37 PM, David Robillard wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 19:03 +0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: >> >> anyway, i'm still looking forward to this libsuil project, by all means >> an excellent effort. sincerely agree that it will do a lot better than >> the current lv2_gtk_ui situation. > > No future tense required, there it is. Make it happen. If I had a Qt > host to test with right now, I'd make sure Gtk2-in-Qt4 actually works, > release, and that's that. > > That said, I think I will just modify the SLV2 API accordingly so you > don't have to use Suil directly, so maybe wait a day (but switching > would be easy, and the sooner I have something to test with, the sooner > this problem is solved, so don't let that stop you). >
i won't :) one question, (btw, i know my english is weird, even on my mothers language i'm lousy:) are you saying that this suil api will get it implicit and integrated into slv2? in a matter of days? i've looked into the "suil.h" and it makes perfect sense... yep, i might arrange some time to test this gtk2_in_qt4 stuff (granted i don't fall into wafhell over more than a week-end ;)) cheers -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
