On 25 Feb 2011 18:34, "David Robillard" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I switched Serd and Sord to 2-clause BSD. Enjoy.
Thanks! I hope to. > The license header is > bigger and uglier and has a bunch of lawyer boiler-plate yelling in it, > which I am not aesthetically please with at all... :) I've always rather liked the look of the BSD boilerplate. > This made me notice something though: lv2.h itself is LGPL (inherited > from ladspa.h). So, if you're implementing an LV2 host there's > inherently LGPL involved anyway. For me that's OK, an LV2 implementation would be of rather different purpose from a general store implementation. Though I can imagine others finding it difficult -- I've noticed some confusion about what exactly the LGPL means for use of the LADSPA header in the past. > I am fully on the pro-GPL card-carrying FSF member team I can see many cases for GPL libraries and BSD libraries, but I've not so often been convinced by the use of the LGPL. Chris
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
