On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 19:40 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote: > On 03/11/2011 07:22 PM, David Robillard wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:08 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote: > > >> I will try and submit a patch to remove glib. It'll take some time because > >> I > >> have dozens of other things to do, but I will work on this. I had a quick > >> look > >> at sord, it seems it only needs glib's sequence and hash table. Is this > >> correct, > >> or will you need some more utilities? > > > > Overall I need sequence, hash table (or hash table like thing, I'll > > probably use a radix tree), and module loading (currently still POSIX in > > SLV2). > > From the docs I see that using GModule only adds Windows support
Well, yeah. "Portable" usually means "have to deal with *%&$# windows", otherwise straight POSIX would be fine :) > , unless you > also care about HP-UX. So, a small abstraction layer around dlopen() and > LoadLibrary() should suffice, no? Yep > > No rush, I may make the relevant lib myself soon if you don't beat me to > > it, I just don't want to hold up the next release for it. > > No rush here as well. I can work on a patch, but on the other side I don't > want > to interfere if you're in the middle of your work. I am deliberately trying to avoid doing that bit of work, because I'll get lost off in la-la computer science land making data structures and benchmarking them and stuff, and not making the LAD related releases I really need to be making. ... I do enjoy that la-la land though. Soon enough. :) -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
