Hello, On Thursday, March 31, 2011 04:25:45 pm Conrad Berhörster wrote: > Hi gerald, > > Op den Middeweken 30 März 2011 Klock 09:45:16 hett Gerald Mwangi schreven: > > Thanx all, tritium looks very much like my own > > preliminary design. One question, does it mask JACK so > > that I only have to use the Tritium API (only > > JACK-Audio, not Midi)?
Well, yes and no. :-) Tritium is very modular (and becoming more so). For example, the Tritium::MixerImpl class we talked about -- it just manages and mixes buffers. It doesn't directly interface to any audio API's. The audio API's are pretty modular, but not quite ready for "general purpose" use. Meanwhile Tritium::Engine sets up the whole sequencer engine and takes care of JACK for you... but that's not what you want. > > I also don't see any support for Inserts/plugins in the > > channel class. Am I wrong? At the moment it's handled like an old mixer board where you have 4 send/returns and you mix in each channel to go to it. This is inherited from Hydrogen, and I haven't decided if I want to do per-channel pre/post insers. > i think, tritium is a little bit to big for your needs. Too big? I disagree. Too immature? Yes, indeed! :-) > further , it depends on QT, It only depends on QtCore and QtXml... which isn't /that/ bad. :-) > has all this midi stuff an > lots of song/player logic. ...which can be omitted if you application doesn't use it. -gabriel _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
