On 13 April 2011 12:44, James Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]> wrote: >> please read your qjackctl/about box whether there's a "JACK Session support >> disabled" written in red. that should say it all > > Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.
... The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine y) against a JACK without session support? Cheers, James. > James. > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
