On 10/10/2011 09:31 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: > >>>> And would (b) a SCHED_RR/50 thread interrupt a running SCHED_FIFO/49 >>>> thread? >>> >>> yes. >> >> OOPS. I misread the question. The answer is No. >> The explanation is correct: >>> >>> All scheduling is preemptive: if a process with a higher static >>> priority becomes ready to run, the currently running process will be >>> preempted and returned to the wait list. > > Now you have me confused ! Why 'no' ? Surely 50 > 49 ? >
I've already corrected this with some off-list email with Michael. Just Forget the the last follow up mail... - I somehow s/interrupt/ be interrupted/ in my mind when re-reading. The original email is correct. ciao, robin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev