On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 20:07 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote: > Thanks everyone for all the help on my architecture questions. It > seems like a lot of the best practise functionality has > tools/components for it already in Jack. I *was* planning on using > rtaudio in order to be cross platform, but if it's a lot easier to get > things done in Jack, i could live with being limited to linux and OS > X. > Jack MIDI should (at least in theory) be portable to any platform where Jack runs. > > Just wondered if I could poll opinions, for a real time step sequencer > meant to do super tight timing and by syncable with other apps, is > Jack going to be a lot easier to work with? Should I just lay into the > jack tutorials?
Definitely yes. Dramatically easier, and (AFAIK) the *only* API that will give you jitter-free sample accurate MIDI between applications. -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
