On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Iain Duncan <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Dave, I would def be more interested in checking it out if it were LGPL > or MIT or somesuch. As I'm sure you know, Csound went LGPL a number of years > ago now, and that definitely increased uptake in the long run. Like Harry, I > just never know what use I might put some code to, so have a bit of a > kneejerk be-careful reaction to GPL. just to be clear, CSound went LGPL *from* the ridiculous "MIT educational license". that was a license that made its source code all but unusable (and at the very least, extremely unclear as to its usability). _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
