On January 6, 2012 1:32:36 PM Dave Stikkolorum wrote: > On 06-01-12 13:22, Paul Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Dave Stikkolorum<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not the communication, but I think Hydrogen over jack has more delay > >> then directly, > >> but I don't know this for sure. > > > > the use of JACK adds no delay. > > > >> Also jack causes other , not jack programs like audio plugins for > >> browser, to hang/stop. > > > > http://jackaudio.org/faq > > > >> Why is jack / or an other audio layer not completely integrated like > >> in > >> windows and mac os, > > > > its not completely integrated on either of those platform. if you want > > to route audio between applications on windows or OS X, guess what > > your likely first choice technology is going to be? > > Ok, maybe that's true. But the use is in the basic situations more > simple I think. > don't get me wrong. I am a linux fan anyway ;) > > > also, because this is linux. there is nobody around to force such > > things. > > Ok, that's true. > Sometimes I get very frustrated to start all these applications seperatly. > Also lash seems to be dead(according to it's creator).
LADISH has stepped in as a emulating replacement for LASH. By now it may be fully functional. Nedko, is it working yet? Tim. > And I don't think Jack sessions is going to be adopted by al these programs. > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
