You can take the latest git by using: git clone git://distrho.git.sf.net/gitroot/distrho/distrho --depth 1
but I don't but I recommend it right now. The current build system (premake) uses static build flags, and would require a lot of manual editing to set it differently. one of my targets once I get everything working with the latest juce-git is to port the build system to cmake. when that happens it will be much easier to compile the plugins. (juce itself is not needed, it pre-included in the repo - and has custom patches) Did you also tested the loomer plugins? how do they behave compared to the disthro ports? On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Dave Phillips <[email protected]>wrote: > On 02/21/2012 07:46 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote: > > Hey Dave, > > I've been working with juce plugins a lot recently, and one of my projects > handles precisely that: > http://distrho.sourceforge.net/ > > juce has not been very linux-friendly in it's early days, and still has a > few issues right now (but it's now much better than before). > I plan to move all plugins from the old jucetice project to DISTRHO (which > most is already done, only missing Jost). > these changes are not yet ready though, as I'm updating all the plugins to > the very latest juce-git modules branch, and also working on a serious > juce-linux issue with realtime kernels. > once everything is done, I'll post to the linuxaudio planet as usual > (through KXStudio news) > > if you're using plugins from here: > http://www.anticore.org/jucetice/ > or > http://code.google.com/p/juced/ > > you'll have issues for sure. Old loomer plugins had issues too, but the > new ones seem to work fine now. > > > Hi Filipe, > > Thanks for the reply. Alas, some of the problematic plugins I tested were > from the DISTRHO collection (specifically the TAL reverbs 2 and 3 and the > TAL vocoder. I tested the prebuilt binaries, btw. Perhaps a local build > would be preferable ? I have the latest JUCE framework and the VST 2.4 SDK, > on an Arch 64-bit system. > > Also, I wanted to add a "Thank you" for those ports and I hope you're > inspired to make more of them. :) > > Best, > > dp > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Dave Phillips <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I notice that whenever I use any Juce-based native Linux VST plugin - fx >> or instrument - in Ardour3 the plugin produces dramatically more xruns than >> any LV2 or LADSPA plug. Does anyone else have that problem ? If so, can >> anything be done about it, apart from raising my latency settings ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> dp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing > [email protected]http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
