On 03/03/2012 11:20 PM, Albert Graef wrote: > On 03/03/2012 08:25 PM, David Robillard wrote: >> Sure, you could just implement dumb raw OSC recording and playback, but >> there's little point in using a DAW for that (not to mention little >> practical musical use) > > But that's exactly what I want. For starters, even just simple messages > consisting of address and POD (like a double value) would be useful. The > data might originally be generated with a multitouch OSC device, say, > and would be recorded by the DAW, which would also let me play back the > data, sending it either to an OSC-capable plugin or an external OSC > application (Pd, say) which would know what to do with it. Call it > automation, if you want. But I think of it as sequencing of OSC > messages; I need the data to be on its own track where I can edit, cut, > copy and move it around as needed. DAW and sequencer programs are good > at these things; that's what they are for. And no, I don't want to use > MIDI instead, where I have to cram everything into control changes or > (N)RPNS and loose both resolution and the descriptive OSC addresses. > > I don't know if it's of practical use for anyone else, but time and > again I would have had good use for this apparently simple feature. If > anyone knows a sequencer or DAW which can do what I sketched out above, > please do tell me. OSC has been around since 1997, for crying out loud. > It's about time that sequencers do more with it than just automatizing > the transport controls. ;-) > > Albert >
Hi Albert, I use Algoscore for sequencing OSC. http://kymatica.com/Software/AlgoScore There was a presentation at Piksel a few years back about this one: https://github.com/sentinelweb/TimeLine-OSC and http://www.iannix.org/ may do the job as well. ..but neither aims for, or comes close to "DAW" functionality. robin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
