Thank you, I will try to bite the source code ;-) I want to say that I was trying NSM yesterday and I'm very impressed by it's simplicity and (a no minor point) it's desing from the graphical point of view. I want to say that I'm very impressed by the thoroughness of the documentation, something that I always admire.
>From the **USER** point of view I had tried Jack Session and LASH (a long time ago when it was a requirement with FST) and by now NSM (a bit hasty decision) is in the 1st place. Maybe now it's the time that people involved in LAD (I'm just a user with a little code experience, but I can help in any way) just try to document the advantages and disadvantages about Jack-session, LASH, LADISH, Scripts, NSM in http://jackaudio.org/persistent_connections, or maybe in the Jack Wiki just like the Jack1 and Jack2 comparison document that was included some time ago. I think that it could help devs and users as well to get a picture of the current Session Managment world in JACK. Thanks for this great peace of software. Diego 2012/3/26 Emanuel Rumpf <[email protected]> > Am 26. März 2012 22:17 schrieb Diego Simak <[email protected]>: > > > > is there any document where to read more about NSM other than > > http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/ ? > > > There is > http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html > > In the source package, there is some documentation too ! > Finally there is always the source code :) > > > Thanks for your help. > > Diego > > > Thanks for interest. > > -- > E.R. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
