On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:25:02PM +0000, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > For anyone who prefers to work with "apps-do-whatever-they-want" appraoch > or "we-have-zero-to-X-support-levels-so-you-dont-know-what-to-expect" , > there are alternatives: JackSession, Lash, Ladish. > > I would prefere at least *one* SM to have a clean and handy solution
votes++ > and hope that is NSM. > I have to dig deeper into the NSM-API myself, > but currently it's not obvious to me, > why disabling a few menu-items and using > symlinks in the session-dir. is recognized as > impregnable obstacle. I fail to see that as well. And I may be an unrecoverable individualist, but if ever I add session management to any app then that app will obey the NSM rules or very similar ones if the session manager is not NSM - it is the obvious thing to do if you want something that works. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
