Am 19.04.2012 19:32, schrieb Adrian Knoth: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:09:52PM +0200, Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter wrote: > >>> install libphat-dev package (if ubuntu) >>> >>> post output of >>> >>> ls /usr/lib/libph* >>> ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libph* >>> >>> cat /etc/ld.so.conf >>> cat /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* >>> >> I need a resizeable phat knob for my project, jackmixdesk. > Glad you mention this. Right after posting the same mail three times in > a row. ;) > >> I want to make my this project available for all users without >> fumbling, so I don't want a dependency on the development package of >> phat. > Speaking with my Debian hat on, I suggest you simply specify any > external requirements in the README and trust the distribution to get it > right. > > The other approach is to use an embedded copy of phat, but we (Debian) > usually don't like this approach and would probably strip it anyway. > > There are pros and cons to embedded copies: > > + known to work > + easy installation, since self-contained > > - increased memory footprint > - additional maintenance overhead (e.g., security fixes) > > > >> Phat dev is even uninstallable for gentoo right now. > Tell them, and they'll fix it. If nobody knows about this, it would > remain broken forever. > > > > Just my €0.02 > Really sorry for that triple post. I did not receive my first two mails back from the list, only a "message rejected" and really really had some impatience.
I reported the phat problem at Gentoo bugzilla because it's an ebuild bug afaik, it was closed as invalid and I was told, this is not a support forum. From the pro-audio list there is no response. Okay wrong order, list first then bugzilla! Shouldn't be such a problem to see if there is something wrong with my build system for someone who's more common with autogen than me. Sincerely Uli _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
