On 07/26/2012 07:00 PM, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote: > On 07/26/2012 06:51 PM, Julien Claassen wrote: >> Hello everyone! I have just asked myself, if it is a good idea to >> use an IR of a Leslie for simulating a Leslie. Correct me, if I'm >> bloody stupid, but working on the basics of convolution, it >> doesn't look promising. Since you take the IR of the Leslie and >> then apply the full IR to each sample, meaning, that you might >> get more of a whirling reverb? Or is there another technique, to >> apply an IR and cycles. Just one "sample" of the IR to one sample >> of the input signal. If I am completely wrong, a simple no will >> suffice. My knowledge of this is basic. I've only got some >> knowledge from a lecture called "signal theory' to back me up and >> it should probably be called "an introduction to" or "basics of" >> at that. :-) Warm regards Julien > > Convolution with a constant convolution kernel (constant over > time) gives you the response of a time-invariant system to the > input signal. A Leslie is clearly not time-invariant.. > > Flo >
You'll want angular dependent convolution https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/doppler/dafx02.pdf CCRMA has more publications on that matter. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
