Le Tue, 31 Dec 2013 12:08:23 -0500, Paul Davis <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Dominique Michel < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In gentoo, we have another politic with the licences. The free > > licence are accepted by portage by default, and for the other > > licences, the user must accept them on a per package basis. For > > linuxsampler, both the portage versions and the pro-audio overlay > > live version are considered as GPL2, as stated into the source code. > > > > It isn't clear that linuxsampler's license is legal. They use the > GPL2 and then add restrictions, which is prohibited by the GPL. It > may or may not affect the license, but either way it is a wierd > situation. Sorry Paul for the double posting, I just hit Answer and it din't make it to the list. Is it not the point of the GPL3 to be a free license that allow to make anything with the work done with the software, but to restrict commercial distribution of the code or the software? Dominique _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
