Hi Fons
Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]> hat am 1. März 2014 um 13:27 geschrieben:
> Are you supposed to optimize by
>
> 1. understanding the algorithm and the context in which it is used,
> and eventually modifying it within given limits on performance,
> precision, etc., or
>
> 2. only by changing the way it is coded (which seems to be suggested
> by your message) ?
>
I'm not sure I get the difference here. As I understand, optimization includes
(1) choice of suitable algorithm for the problem, (2) smart implementation, i.e.
writing code such that the compiler can apply smart optimization (e.g. aliasing)
and (3) optimizing for a particular microarchitecure (leveraging instruction
level paralellism for a fixed CPU model).
If choosing a error bound + approximation algorithm yields acceptable result, I
think that is fine. Is that your point?
> I've got something you work on but it would have to be treated as
> confidential.
We will have to submit code to a university-internal repository and it will run
through some software plagiarism system. Would that be a problem?
Thanks,
Jeremia
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
