On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 08:41 +0100, John Rigg wrote: On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:10:58AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 20:06 +0100, John Rigg wrote: > > > The P+G faders (generally regarded as the best) > > > > Actually you get fader units for Studer with P&G, but also with Alps > > faders. Such a module usually costs more than a complete home recording > > mixer. > > True, but how much more does it cost to emulate a P+G fader in software > compared with the cheaper ones?
Good point. It still doesn't matter what tapper is used, since both kinds don't cause issues. On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 12:32 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:29:30 +0200, John Rigg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ralf, please stop dictating how others should work. I've been recording > > in studios for 35 years and I like to think I know what I'm doing. Not > > everyone who has different working methods from yours is an idiot, but > > that seems to be what you are implying. > > Hi John, > > you claimed that you know how to record right in the first place, so that > you don't need EQs for the mixing, that's why you claimed that EQs by > default for each mixer channel could be a nuisance. You might have the > gift to know how the frequencies will interact for the mix, already when > doing the mix, but that is a very unusual gift. It's common for good audio ^^^ recordings :D, not "mix" _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
