On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:46:17AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote: > The only downside is longer sysex events. I think there is work > underway to deal with this as well, but of course a long sysex no > longer would have sample acurate timing (maybe the first part will > be time stamped) or at least would have added latency (ie. it would > no longer be real time anyway). But that is a problem rawmidi would > have to deal with as well. I do not know if there is a particular > byte count limit to sysex events or if it varies with jack latency > (the length of the cycle). But if you expect users to use this live, > then it needs to work with reasonably low latency.
I can't help but think that if you're doing something that requires sample-accurate sysex messages, you're doing something a bit strange and wrong :-D -- Gordonjcp MM0YEQ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
