I understand. Thanks again
Gerald

On 28.04.2015 21:09, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 05:12 PM, Gerald wrote:
>> By 'crude' do you mean it does the job, but not that well?
> What I really mean is that it wasn't written for use in a specific
> application, so it hasn't had any real testing or evaluation. The
> purpose of it is to be a handy tool that you can use to figure out
> whether this sort of transformation makes a difference to your feature
> extractor, rather than necessarily to be the final implementation you'd
> actually put in the extractor.
>
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Reply via email to