On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 03:01:06PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > Because I can't tell what jack_delay actually does anymore, and > because the output of jack_iodelay is deliberately and intentionally > different.
In this case both gave the same result (as n2j and j2n have their port latencies set to zero). Anyway this is irrelevant. The delay change was just a hint that something was wrong. As already said the setup was zita-n2j -> jack_(io)delay -> zita-j2n and there were no other connenctions to any of them. So the order of execution within each cycle should be left to right. As already said the measured delay alternated between the correct value and the same plus one period. In the latter case j2n was run *before* n2j in each cycle. See original post for details on how this was verified. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev