On 2018-08-27 21:23:47 (+0200), Christopher Arndt wrote:
> Am 26.08.18 um 14:49 schrieb Ralf Mattes:
> >  
> > Am Sonntag, 26. August 2018 13:07 CEST, Fons Adriaensen 
> > <f...@linuxaudio.org> schrieb: 
> >> I seem to have both pkgconf and pkg-config, and on Archlinux both
> >> are even provided by the same package.
> >>
> >> I used pkgconf as suggested by an Archlinux packager. Don't know 
> >> if this is the best choice to support other distros.
> > 
> > No, it's not.
> 
> >> Anyway, all that is required is -I/usr/include/freetype2 and maybe
> >> that is what I should use.
> 
> > Please don't.
> 
> Agree on both accounts. Just use 'pkg-config' like everybody else.
I don't.

pkgconf [1] is a valid replacement of pkg-config (by implementing it
with even more features and better .pc handling) and available on many,
if not all, distros (e.g. [2] [3] [4]). In some it is even the default
by now.

Additionally, this is all better, than relying on a convenience layer
hack job, such as the `freetype-config` script (that should've never
even been part of pkg-config to begin with).

Best,
David

[1] https://git.dereferenced.org/pkgconf/pkgconf
[2] https://packages.debian.org/sid/pkgconf
[3] https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=pkgconf
[4] 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/pkgconf_as_system_pkg-config_implementation

-- 
https://sleepmap.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Reply via email to