paul winkler wrote:
>Sounds like a weird hack that would lose the whole point of using LADSPA
>in the first place (i.e. reusability by different applications and/or
>being able to use existing LADSPA hosts).
Probably correct. I've seen weirder workarounds than this, though. I
don't like them, but they do occasionally have their place.
>The LADSPA API is contained in this header file:
>http://www.ladspa.org/ladspa_sdk/ladspa.h.txt
Yes, I have that already. However, not having knowledge of the underlying
structure, I didn't understand it. I'm getting there.
Thanks again,
Greg Berchin
