**********************************************************************
I wish to fully retract this message. My mail program told me that it
wasn't sent. I more carefull read Juhana's message, and saw that he
was not misunderstanding much, if anything, at all. I tried to cancel
the outgoing message, apparently unsuccessfully. sincere apologies.
**********************************************************************
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
>>Hello. I have toyed with the following idea (no patent pending).
>>
>>CVS system for audio projects:
> [ ... ]
>>I'm sure most of the functionality of Audio-CVS can be handled
>>with the CVS.
>
>Juhana, you are, unfortunately, once again demonstrating the problems
>of "designing without coding".
>
>Non-linear, non-destructive (NLND) editing is an inherently much more complex
>problem than your idea suggests.
>
>You are also making a mistake that I made in Ardour. NLND *wave*
>editing is useful, but nowhere near as useful as NLND *music*
>editing. Representing edited *music* is not done with WAV, or AIFF;
>instead, it would be done with standards like AES31 and/or OMF.
>
>In this case, CVS probably would work, since those files are just text
>files describing playlists, in essence.
>
>--p
>
>
