>With respect to Paul's suggestion that installing libraries from >packages is asking for trouble, I beg to differ. I'm inclined to >think that if packages cause trouble, it's that there's a bug >somewhere, either in the package or in the app. Lib packages are >not inherently broken IMHO ; they usually work for me. then you haven't done much with C++ libraries, especially since the debacle of RH's move to gcc 2.96, which broke binary compatibility with g++ 2.95. not only that, but i have heard that there were intermediate versions of gcc they packaged with are not even binary compatible with each other. in addition, you get RPMs that weren't built correctly. its quite common on the C++-based mailing lists i'm on to hear "it crashed, so i fetched the tarball, built+installed from that, and now it works great". --p
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q D. Stimits
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Andre Majorel
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Will Benton
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q D. Stimits
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI)
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q D. Stimits
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Kevin Conder
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Joe Pfeiffer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q D. Stimits
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q D. Stimits
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Mark Constable
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Nick Bailey
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour Q Steve Harris
