On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] S�bastien M�trot wrote:
> > However, some might see it a bit rude to take their Linux plugins and
> > compile them for Windows and because of this I've not encouraged spread to
> > other platforms. What do folk think? I wouldn't mind for my CMT plugins.
> >
>
> I think they made this choice when they decided what kind of licence they
> had to apply to their work. They can regret afterwards but that's just how
> things are supposed to be in OSS world aren't they?
There isn't any reason a person can't change the licence of the software
they wrote. I don't think that they changes are retroactive though. The
prior software releases still have the original licence. This is just my
interpretation though.
So, Steve, you could relicence your stuff as LGPL if you wanted to.
Taybin
