> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karl > MacMillan > Sent: 29 September 2001 23:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA revisited (was: LAAGA and > supporting programs) [...] > It is certainly true that there is only one type of "exchange" currently > written for JACK, and that is for low-latency PCM. This does not mean that > the API is not suitable for other types of connections, though. I think > the beauty of the JACK API is that the clients have so few > responsibilities, which actually makes it easier to provide different > backends. I would certainly be interested in some specific cases that you > think cannot be handled by the JACK api - as Paul said, now is a good time > to talk about these issues. > > Karl [....]
Hmmm, LADMEA is written to be as short as possible with little/no redundancy, possibly at the slight expense of performance. Which features do you think LADMEA has that aren't necessary (other than the Codec spec which is a bit of an appendix)? --Richard
