Tim Goetze wrote: > > >> Assuming the clocks on the cards really *are* running at constant > >> rates. I wonder how consistent those things are? (I'm not a (digital) > >> hardware guy...) > > > >I was and I can tell you they will drift relative to one another. It > >will probably be less than 50 part per million. > > i wonder why they don't just take the PCI clock and divide it to generate > the sample word clock. it should be stable enough, shouldn't it? > > tim
hiimanoverclockerwhydoallmysoundsplaysofuckingfast ? -- J�rn Nettingsmeier home://Kurf�rstenstr.49.45138.Essen.Germany phone://+49.201.491621 http://spunk.dnsalias.org http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/
