On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI) wrote: > IMO the fact that make stays with us means that it handles its task at > least sort-of-ok... it of course has limitations...
I agree. But given the number of projects that use automake now, it seems that people want something higher level. I think the main problem with make is that its syntax is like nuthin' else. I should check out some of those GUI dependency graphs that compile to makefiles. That's probably the proper direction for build tools to evolve towards. Taybin
