> > gdam 0.941 is now available > > OK, so what would it take to get you to add JACK support to gdam? > > :)
Not much, i'm already planning on it :) support for Core Audio (and port audio, which is in progress) gave me a callback device class, so adding JACK output should be rather simple. i was waiting for you to move ardour to JACK, as you'd hinted there were still details to work out. If you think it is stable enough (in the API at least) for everyone to start supporting it, i won't wait. I'm looking forward to not only supporting output to JACK, but also supporting JACK input i.e. routing tracker and synthesis apps through our filter stacks. It seems that Core Audio also has this in mind, although i've yet to see an example. -geoff
