>> > more seriously, do you think there should be support for the "GUI is >> > not running on the same system as the LADSPA host" case ? >> >> I think there should at least be the potential for future support even if >> it doesnt exist right now. > LADSPA 3.0?
no, support for this is already present in LCP 0.0.1. notice that the wording didn't say that the LADSPA plugin is on a different system from the host, merely that the GUI is running on a different system than the host. in the tarball, for example: host1> ./s <my-ip-address>:port & # the "host" host2> ./c <my-ip-address>:port # the "GUI" --p
