Steve Harris wrote: >On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:57:30 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> For no param change rate this cost will be greater than the communication >> cost involved anyway. > >Welll... cost is a bit of a vague term. HTTP has both higher latency >(slightly), computational cost (greatly), complexity (massivly). > >You could argue in favour of an HTTP implementation that wasn't propper >HTTP, but then where's the point? > >My view of some protocols, in order of roughly how appropriate I think >they are for this problem: > >LCP: >+ fast >+ simple >+ we allready have exemplar code >- not an existing standard (does that matter?)
votes[LCP]++; tim
