dave willis wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Paul Davis wrote: > > ??? dats are 48000, and cds are 44100. doesn't some sort of resampling > need to occur here?
Every pro DAT I've ever used has had the option to run at 44100, an option I always to take advantage of to avoid resampling or multiple D/A/D conversions. (BTW, unless you've got really good resampling software/hardware, a D/A/D convsersion will often sound better than a resample.) -dgm
