> >There is an option where you can request the patent to re-evaluate > >the patent. However, if they still don't find any problems then you > >just made the patent _much_ harder to invalidate. > > Whoops I guess I should read more carefully next time. :)) Still, with those arguments Paul stated, it's very likely to achieve this. Marek
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Joshua Haberman
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Joshua Haberman
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Joshua Haberman
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO, GUI...was: (EVO status) Marek Peteraj
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO, GUI...was: (EVO status) Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Richard A. Smith
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO legal status Marek Peteraj
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Marek Peteraj
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Nick Bailey
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO status...was: (open-source like... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Richard A. Smith
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Richard A. Smith
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Marek Peteraj
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Streaming client for JACK Paul Davis
