On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:01:07 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > The autoconf stuff for my plugins, doesn't require ladspa.h (wooops), > > there is a question about whether I should just include it, or make > > configure require it. > > > > I think I'd rather do the latter, but the former might be more convienient > > for users, any thoughts? > > I've got an impression that we have enough LADSPA-aware software > already it is not too much to ask for the user to install > ladspa.h on the system.
OK, its 3 to 2 (with some anonymous votes ;) so its going in autoconf. I guess ardour would be the right place to look for the macro... - Steve
