xk wrote: >In Windows I use the rdtsc assembler instruction. It returns a 64 bit >integer (in EAX:EDX I think) which represent the amount of processors cycles >that have passed from the last reset. Computing the difference between two >values and taking into account the freq of the CPU (you have to figure it >out somehow), you get a very accurate timer.
are you trying to fool somebody into writing a sequencer clock that busy-waits on the cycle counter? tim "of all common programmer errors, windows is the most common."
