On Sun, 12 May 2002, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2002, Likai Liu wrote: > > > Please consider my proposal for array extension of the LADSPA: > > As the one who encouraged to "show the code", I feel obliged to give at > least some feedback, but I'm afraid it's not very positive this time. The > proposal itself looks fine, but I'm not sure how much interest this gets > from developers of current LADSPA hosts. > > For instance ecasound's own plugin system (on top of which LADSPA plugins > are mapped) doesn't support arrays, so it would be a major change to add > support for this feature. On the other hand ecasound already has a > mechanisms in place for representing envelopes (sequences of control data > changes) and large parameter sets (ecasound plugins can change their > parameter interface dynamically during runtime). > > So this is my view on the issue. Let's see what other people think...
Speaking for GLAME the issues are similar - envelopes are handled as separate stream of data. So this LADSPA extension does not make sense to me. Richard. -- Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/ The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/
