On Fri, 17 May 2002 17:38:24 +0100 Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:15:44 +0100, mike rawes wrote: > > I haven't looked at your code yet (although I have > > compiled and listened to the results - quite > > nice'n'dirty :) but I am curious: How are you indexing > > yours? > > Well, by harmonic number, so for square adjacent tables have the same > pointer. > > I guess thats equivalent to frequency, but it moves where you're doing > the maths. I ran into a similar problem with adjacent phases for a different reason: My tables are all different sizes. I just store a fudge factor for each wavetable (and an extra multiply in the main loop). Just goes to prove timtowtdi! -- Myk _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
