On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:32:22 +0200 (CEST) "Dr. Matthias Nagorni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote: > > > one would hope that you implemented them all as LADSPA plugins so > > that your hard work can be used by many different audio applications > > ... Well, yes, of course I thought about implementing them as LADSPA > > plugin. But here we are again: My VCF module has two additional > > audio rate inputs for frequency and resonance control. And there is > > a comboBox selector for the filter type... > But OK, I will implement one LADSPA plugin per filter. Dynamic > resonance control is not so important, so there will be two audio > inputs, one for the signal and one for frequency control. Why not do plugins for both types of input port (except the audio in, obviously)? I know that this means there are several variants per plugin - but this increases flexibility. Audio ports are good for doing FM type things, whereas Control ports trade this off for less cycles per block. > > Matthias > > -- > Dr. Matthias Nagorni > SuSE GmbH > Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 phone: +49 911 74053375 > D - 90429 Nuernberg fax : +49 911 74053483 -- Myk _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
