On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:27:25 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:21:59 +0100, Richard W.E. Furse wrote: > >> I've put a provisional version of the LADSPA SDK including the LADSPA v1.1 > >> header file at > >> > >> http://www.ladspa.org/ladspa_sdk_dev.tgz > > said it then, will say it again: > > the proposed mechanism for default values is a kludge. > > i'm against it.
I understand your objections, but I think the alternatives (that keep binary compatibility) are just as bad in there own way. This defaults issue has been kicking around for months now. FWIW I added default hints to all my plugins and there was only one port where I couldn't get exactly the default value I wanted (2 v's 1) and that was pretty irrelevant. I have a snapshot it anyone wants to see it: http://plugin.org.uk/snapshots/swh-plugins-2002-07-09.tar.gz - Steve
