> >Again, I agree with you. That\'s also why I am against a constant nframes, > >because there is hardware that really doesn\'t want nframes constant. > > such as?
How should I know? :) I heard some yamaha soundcards generate interrupts at a constant rate not depending on the sample rate. Perhaps there is even hardware that doesn\'t generate interrupts itself? I am not saying this is good hardware design. Having large fluctuations in nframes will limit the effective available cpu time for processing (processing time != time to be processed). But hardware with small variations in the frames per interrupt might exist and I don\'t see that many good reasons to not support it. --martijn Powered by ASHosting
