On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
> Defaults hints are a bit of kludge, but the least kludgy of the offerings -
> suggestion was we'd prefer a compromise like this in 1.1. When I coded 1.0 I
> anticipated defaults within the remit of GUIs or 'standard patch' mechanisms
> (prob. XML) - I can revert.
Okay. I see. I was more wondering about the usage. Shouldn't:
#define LADSPA_IS_HINT_DEFAULT_LOW (((x) & LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_MASK)\
== LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_LOW)
actually be written as:
#define LADSPA_IS_HINT_DEFAULT_LOW(x) (((x) & LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_MASK)\
== LADSPA_HINT_DEFAULT_LOW)
I think that was confusing me.
Taybin
