On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 11:56:02 +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > sure, this would only be for author-defined defaults, which would > assumedly be minimal and available through getDefault(), and thus > implicitly available on any architecture the plugin is available on.
Well, I'm currently planning to support LADSPA 1.1-pre-n style defaults anyway. People who object can ignore them. People who object to angle brackets can use them. > > OTOH, I am starting to think that the live format should be a GDBM file > > (or TDM, I assume its similar), and RDF/XML should just be used for > > import/export. This adds an extra layer around the settings, but might be > > generally better. > > cool Yes ;) NB. this wont be for a while, the first versions will use preloaded RDF structures for simplicitity. If it takes off I can worry about this kind of thing. Its really pretty damn efficient anyway. - Steve
