On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, n++k wrote: > |>What? It's a shame he won't fight this. INAL, but isn't the user > |>interface non-copyrightable? > | > |well i guess his next version will be even better :) > > My first thought when i saw the screenshot was that considering it > seems he took the original interface' assets (knobs+bg+more) it > was a clear copyright infrigement. > > (I still don't get what went into his mind)
Oh really? I didn't know that the interface was such a clear knockoff. Maybe they had a valid complaint then. Taybin
