On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:09:24 +0200, Reiner Klenk wrote: > > I've used both (both are available as RPMs from Planet CCRMA), and they > > are good, but I think that the plugin~ object is a bit awkward, and I > > couldn't express all LADSPA ports in message objects (some problem with > > spaces I think). > > I don't know which version of plugin~ you were looking at. In the current > version it is possible to specify control inputs by number rather than > name, thereby working around the mentioned problem.
OK, cheers, I probably just didn't RTMF enough. - Steve
