Steve Harris wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:10:14 -0800, Paul Winkler wrote:
>> > For the record my current guess for an amp process is:
>> >
>> > .-> bandpass -> shaper -. .--- LP <--.
>> > | | v |
>> > input -> EQ? -+-> bandpass -> shaper -+-> delay -> EQ ---> output
>> > | |
>> > `-> bandpass -> shaper -'
>>
>> well, we'd have to try it and see :)
>>
>> the delay w/ lp in feedback - is that basically
>> how you make a resonant lopass filter?
>
>No, its a primitive cabinet simulator. Just model reflections off the back
>wall. The LP represents absorbion in the fiberous stuff inside. I read
>about the technique somewhere... music-dsp probably.
i do think that the in-cab echo is part of the impulse response
if you have a convolver ('imp_1199', 'unmatched') following the
shaper summation node. it sounds to me like it is fwiw.
how many split bands do you think we'll need?
nice ascii, btw.
tim
