> as you can hopefully see, things start to get more and more and more > complex. its not impossible to do this, but its hard, and i have much > more important things on my mind than re-engineering the 80,000 lines > of Ardour's code to make an in-process version possible. > > --p >
So, I presume it is impossible to get let's say an i-p version of Jack running that can accept both i-p and o-o-p connections (so for instance Ardour would be o-o-p, while freqtweak i-p)? If this were possible, then the clients could harness the potential of low-latency Jack, while more complex apps like Ardour would have a kind of a compromise. Would this be feasible? Alternately, you spoke of o-o-p being just not reliable enough. What aspect of Linux needs to improve in order for o-o-p to become as reliable as i-i-p? Thanks for all the valuable info! Ico
