On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:45:04 +0100 (CET), Tim Goetze wrote: > Mark, > > Paul Davis wrote: > >> It isn't my intention to flame you, but has anyone here actually read and > >>studied the patent? Have you? I haven't. Someone said they had a copy? Let's > >>hear a listing of what the actual patent claims are before we create a > >>defense. > > > >i've read the patent. > ... > > i assume paul knows what he's talking about, and i agree > completely to his opinion.
I'll second that. I have copies of both patents. I've read them but Paul seems to have a much better handle on what thier claims are. If you are still interested contact me and I'll try to eek out some time to re-read and list the specific claims. I haven't compared the differences between the first patent and the second one (which is a re-issue of the first one) but it seems to just add some more generic claims. -- Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 479.846.5777 x104 Sr. Design Engineer http://www.bitworks.com
